Quotes on Textual Preservation
Srila Prabhupada on Preserving His Books
The following quotes demonstrate Prabhupada’s consistent and emphatic position: his books should be preserved as he wrote them.
On Not Adding Personal Manufacture
“Adding personal manufacture spoils everything.”
— Letter to Hayagriva, January 18, 1972
This instruction was given to Prabhupada’s own editor. The principle is clear: even an authorized editor should not add his own interpretations or preferences to the text.
On Accepting the Acarya’s Words As They Are
“As It Is means no interpretation.”
— January 5, 1977
The title “Bhagavad-gita As It Is” was chosen precisely because Prabhupada wanted to present Krishna’s words without adulteration. The same principle applies to Prabhupada’s own words.
On Transcendental Literature
“Only those blessed by Vyasadeva can write transcendental literature.”
— February 16, 1977
This statement establishes that the ability to produce transcendental literature is not an academic qualification but a spiritual one. An editor who lacks this spiritual qualification cannot presume to improve upon the work of one who possesses it.
“Transcendental literature requires divine favor, not academic qualifications.”
— Sri Caitanya-caritamrita, Adi 14.1
“Pure devotees’ writing receives divine intelligence; mundane scholars’ work lacks transcendental effect.”
— Sri Caitanya-caritamrita, Adi 8.39
Scriptural References
Sri Caitanya-caritamrita, Antya 7.134
The false pride of thinking one can improve upon the acarya’s words is specifically condemned in scripture. The principle is that a disciple should serve the acarya’s words, not edit them.
Sri Caitanya-caritamrita, Madhya 22.21-28
These verses describe the proper attitude toward previous acaryas and their writings. The instruction is to honor and preserve, not to revise and replace.
The Principle of Authority
These quotes, taken together, establish several key principles:
-
Transcendental literature is not ordinary writing. It carries spiritual potency that comes from the author’s realization, not from literary skill.
-
Editing is serving, not improving. An editor’s role is to help present the author’s words clearly, not to substitute his own judgment for the author’s choices.
-
The author’s departure does not grant editorial license. If anything, the author’s physical absence makes preservation even more important, since the author can no longer correct unauthorized changes.
-
Academic qualifications are insufficient. Knowledge of grammar, style, and publishing conventions does not qualify one to alter transcendental literature. Spiritual qualification is required.
-
Personal manufacture destroys potency. When an editor adds, removes, or changes content based on personal preference, the transcendental effect of the original is diminished.
A Responsibility
These 29 authoritative statements — from Prabhupada’s letters, conversations, lectures, and from scripture itself — constitute a clear mandate. Those who have received Prabhupada’s books have a responsibility to preserve them exactly as he gave them. This is not sentimentality; it is the standard of disciplic succession that has preserved Vedic knowledge for thousands of years.